MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399908809 · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2024.3417716

A 382nVrms 100GΩ@50Hz Active Electrode for Dry-Electrode EEG Recording

2024· article· en· W4399908809 on OpenAlexaff
Guanghua Qian, Yanxing Suo, Qiao Cai, Yong Lian

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsElectrodeElectroencephalographyMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsComputer scienceElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringChemistryEngineeringPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes a low noise and ultra-high input impedance active electrode (AE) interface chip for dry-electrode EEG recording. To compensate the input parasitic capacitance and the ESD leakage, power/ground/ESD bootstrapping is proposed. This design integrates chopping stabilization technique to suppress flicker noise of the amplifier which has never been tackled in previous bootstrapped AE design. Both on-chip and off-chip input routing is active shielded to minimize wire parasitic. Fabricated in a 0.18μm CMOS process, the AE core occupies about 0.056mm2and draws 17.95μA from a 1.8V supply. The proposed AE achieves 100GΩ input impedance at 50Hz and over 1GΩ at 1kHz with a low input-referred noise of 382nVrms integrated from 0.5Hz to 70Hz. This design is the first 100GΩ@50Hz input impedance chopper stabilized AE compared to the state-of-the-art. Dry-electrode EEG recording capability of the proposed AE are verified on three types of experiments including spontaneous α-wave, event related potential and steady-state visual evoked potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and SystemsSame topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207