MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399910322 · doi:10.62534/rseq.aq.1957

Comunicado a los miembros de la RSEQ

2023· article· es· W4399910322 on OpenAlexaff
Mar Gómez‐Gallego

Bibliographic record

VenueAnales de Química de la RSEQ · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and bioethics in healthcare
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Respuesta: el sol se convertir en una gigante roja en 5.000 millones de aos, es decir, 5*10 3 * 10 6 = 5*10 9 aos.Como un ao tiene 3.2 *10 7 segundos 2*10 7 segundos, el Sol se convertir en una gigante roja en aproximadamente 10 17 segundos.Segunda pregunta: cunto tiempo falta para que se desaparezca el Universo?Respuesta: entre 10 14 y 10 32 aos.Es decir, segn el razonamiento anterior, entre 10 21 y 10 39 segundos.Tercera pregunta: cuntas molculas hay ahora?Respuesta: ahora hay algo menos de 200 millones = 2*10 8 .Cuarta pregunta (mltiple): Cuntas molculas podrn sintetizar los humanos?A qu velocidad las pueden preparar?Respuesta: supongamos, como hiptesis atrevida, que todos los humanos pueden sintetizar unas 10 3 molculas

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnales de Química de la RSEQSame topicEthics and bioethics in healthcareFrench-language works237,207