MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Maciej z Miechowa. Astrolog, medyk, a może jatromatematyk?

2024· article· en· W4399910438 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sylwia Konarska-Zimnicka

Bibliographic record

VenueMedycyna Nowożytna · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Cultural Studies of Poland
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrologyQuarter (Canadian coin)EliteReincarnationPsychologyHistoryClassicsPhilosophyPolitical scienceLawTheologyPoliticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maciej of Miechów is one of the most eminent representatives of the Kraków scientifi c community of the second half of the 15th century and the fi rst quarter of the 16th century. He was a versatile scholar, a valued teacher, an excellent administrator (he served eight times as the university’s rector) and a widely respected philanthropist. He gained fame and recognition, as well as a considerable fortune, by practising medicine and astrology. On more than one occasion, he provided medical and astrological advice to representatives of the elite and the poor of Krakow. Rather a practitioner, much less a theoretician, his activities focused on the utilitarian function of both astrology and medicine. He valued both fi elds of cognition, practised both, but could he be called an iatromathematician? An analysis of this thread is undertaken in this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedycyna NowożytnaSame topicHistorical and Cultural Studies of PolandFrench-language works237,207