Bibliographic record
Abstract
Building codes commonly accept inelastic deformations that inevitably occur due to seismic excursions in structures. To control the damage, limits on the inelastic deformations have been established. Standard passive energy dissipation systems have been used to reduce the damage, generally with some effectiveness. The damped rigid substructure (DRS) passive damping system, proposed in this article, geometrically amplifies the damper displacements and exerts a re‐centering force, leading to effective discharge of the seismic energy to the extent that structural damage can be prevented. This is achieved using common damped and undamped diagonals arranged per implementation and design principles introduced in this article. The DRS system can considerably reduce material consumption and construction costs, leading to more sustainable structures when seismic forces govern the design. It can also benefit from the usage of high‐strength materials to enhance its re‐centering mechanism. The system is adaptable to the architectural needs and can be used for all categories of importance and height variation, made of steel or concrete.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".