Smart city fire surveillance: A deep state‐space model with intelligent agents
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the realm of smart city development, the integration of intelligent agents has emerged as a pivotal strategy to enhance the efficacy of search methodologies. This study introduces a novel state‐space navigational model employing intelligent agents tailored specifically for fire surveillance in urban environments. Central to this model is the fusion of a convolutional neural network and multilayer perceptron, enabling accurate fire detection and localisation. Leveraging this capability, the intelligent agent proactively navigates through the search space, guided by the shortest path to the identified fire location. The utilisation of the A* algorithm as the search mechanism underscores the efficiency and efficacy of our proposed approach. Implemented in Python and Gephi, our method surpasses traditional search algorithms, both informed and uninformed, demonstrating its effectiveness in navigating urban landscapes for fire surveillance. This research study contributes significantly to the field by offering a robust solution for proactive fire detection and surveillance in smart city environments, thereby enhancing public safety and urban resilience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it