MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399922291 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110617

Application of Grey-Taguchi Method Optimizes the Structural Friction Clutch Disc

2024· article· en· W4399922291 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Do Van Nang

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClutchTaguchi methodsMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In which the clutch disc is the part that is heavily influenced by the pressure disc and engine flywheel.Therefore, the design of the clutch disc faces many difficulties.In this investigation, the model of the clutch disc with design variables and their level was built in SolidWorks.In which, variable A is the friction disc thickness with 3 levels of 3mm, 3.3mm, 3.5mm and B is the diameter of the friction disc groove with levels of 0.25mm, 0.5mm, 0.75mm and variable C is the diameter rivet hole with grades 2.75mm, 3mm, 3.25mm finally D is the young's modulus of the materials for all the part of the clutch are aluminum of 70GPa, copper of 128GPa and structural steel of 200GPa, respectively.The deformation and the equivalent stress were estimated by finite element analysis (FEM) in ANSYS.The simulation data of the study are used to minimize the deformation and stress of the clutch disc by grey relation analysis based on Taguchi method.The results of the FEM indicated that the input variables had a significant influence on the deformation and stress of the clutch disc.Then, the above results were verified by signal to noise (S/N) analysis, analysis of means, analysis of variance, regression analysis, and plot surface.All are in agreement with the error of the predicted value and the optimal value of the grey relational grade is 1.69%.The optimal value of the deformation and stress are 0.033115mm and 66.889MPa, respectively.This proves that these results are very reliable.Therefore, the proposed method is very effective in optimizing the structure of mechanical products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207