Association between Brain Structure and Cognitive Ability during Adolescence: Insights from a Comprehensive Large-Scale Analysis of 9 to 15 Year-Olds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Significant changes occur in brain structure and cognitive abilities during adolescence. Investigating their association can provide insight into brain-based cognitive development, yet previous studies were limited by narrow brain measures, small samples, and lacking focus on age-related variation. Here, we analyzed a large cohort ( N = 8,534, age 9–15) from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development dataset. Using structural MRI and diffusion imaging, we derived 16 regional structural measures and integrated them via morphometric similarity networks to characterize 16,563 regional, connectivity, and hub features. We applied large-scale computational models to investigate their associations with performance on seven cognitive subtests and general intelligence ( g ), as well as age-related changes. Brain areas most strongly associated with cognitive ability also showed the greatest age-related variability in these associations, located primarily in the frontal, temporal, and occipital lobes. Structural MRI measures exhibited stronger associations with cognition and greater age-related variability than diffusion-derived metrics, while global hub measures showed stronger and more variable associations than local measures. Overall, our study provides a comprehensive and reliable understanding of brain structure-cognition associations during adolescence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".