A Label‐Efficient Framework for Automated Sinonasal CT Segmentation in Image‐Guided Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Segmentation, the partitioning of patient imaging into multiple, labeled segments, has several potential clinical benefits but when performed manually is tedious and resource intensive. Automated deep learning (DL)-based segmentation methods can streamline the process. The objective of this study was to evaluate a label-efficient DL pipeline that requires only a small number of annotated scans for semantic segmentation of sinonasal structures in CT scans. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic institution. METHODS: Forty CT scans were used in this study including 16 scans in which the nasal septum (NS), inferior turbinate (IT), maxillary sinus (MS), and optic nerve (ON) were manually annotated using an open-source software. A label-efficient DL framework was used to train jointly on a few manually labeled scans and the remaining unlabeled scans. Quantitative analysis was then performed to obtain the number of annotated scans needed to achieve submillimeter average surface distances (ASDs). RESULTS: Our findings reveal that merely four labeled scans are necessary to achieve median submillimeter ASDs for large sinonasal structures-NS (0.96 mm), IT (0.74 mm), and MS (0.43 mm), whereas eight scans are required for smaller structures-ON (0.80 mm). CONCLUSION: We have evaluated a label-efficient pipeline for segmentation of sinonasal structures. Empirical results demonstrate that automated DL methods can achieve submillimeter accuracy using a small number of labeled CT scans. Our pipeline has the potential to improve pre-operative planning workflows, robotic- and image-guidance navigation systems, computer-assisted diagnosis, and the construction of statistical shape models to quantify population variations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".