MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399930718 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.190614

Building Community-Based Climate Resilience Through MASAKLIM (Climate-Conscious Students): A Survey Study

2024· article· en· W4399930718 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dewi Gunawati, Seca Gandaseca

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResilience (materials science)Environmental resource managementClimate changeCommunity resilienceClimate resilienceEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental planningGeographyEngineeringGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of climate change is a significant issue that is worsening.It leads to more disasters and difficulties.These challenges will keep growing in the coming years.To mitigate the impact of climate change, individuals must be conscious of environmental preservation.This study aims to analyze MASAKLIM, an initiative focused on communication, information, and education, which aims to promote sustainable waste management and support climate resilience.The research applied a quantitative approach using survey design.The study was conducted at Sebelas Maret University and involved undergraduate and postgraduate Civics students from FKIP, UNS who took Civic ecology courses during the even semester of 2023.This research showed that MASAKLIM is a legitimate initiative undertaken by students to mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change through two key activities: a).reducing the amount of packaging waste generated by purchasing large products or avoiding the use of disposable products, and b).reducing the use of disposable plastic shopping bags in favour of reusable alternatives.The initiative promotes environmental awareness and effective management practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicEducational Methods and ImpactsFrench-language works237,207