MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399939162 · doi:10.1109/tcpmt.2024.3418342

High-Dimensional Uncertainty Quantification Using Stochastic Galerkin and Tensor Decomposition

2024· article· en· W4399939162 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecompositionTensor (intrinsic definition)Galerkin methodTensor decompositionUncertainty quantificationApplied mathematicsMathematicsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceFinite element methodPhysicsPure mathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates the application of tensor decomposition and the stochastic Galerkin method for the uncertainty quantification of complex systems characterized by high parameter dimensionality. By employing these methods, we construct surrogate models aimed at efficiently predicting system output uncertainty. The effectiveness of our approaches is demonstrated through a comparative analysis of accuracy and central processing unit (CPU) cost with conventional Galerkin methods, using two transmission line circuit examples with up to 25 parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it