A Time-Domain Doppler Estimation and Waveform Recovery Approach with Iterative and Ensemble Techniques for Bi-Phase Code in Radar Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel, cost-effective technique for estimating the Doppler effect in the time domain using a single pulse and subsequently leveraging the precise Doppler value to recover the radar waveform. The proposed system offers several key advantages over existing techniques, including the ability to calculate the target speed without any frequency ambiguity and the ability to detect a wide range of target speeds. These two features are not available in any existing techniques, including the conventional moving target detection (MTD) processor. To ensure improved accuracy and robust estimation, the system employs ensemble and iterative techniques by recursively and efficiently reducing the Doppler residues from the signal. Furthermore, the proposed system demonstrates effective signal recovery of a well-known bi-phase code shape at low signal-to-noise ratios in just a few iterations. The performance evaluation of the new algorithm demonstrates its practicability and its superiority over traditional radar systems. Implementation on software-defined radio (SDR) reveals that the proposed system excels in Doppler estimation and signal recovery at low SNRs, demonstrating promising results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".