MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399976992 · doi:10.3390/ma17133076

Recent Progress in Creep-Resistant Aluminum Alloys for Diesel Engine Applications: A Review

2024· review· en· W4399976992 on OpenAlexafffund
Raul Irving Arriaga-Benitez, Mihriban Pekguleryuz

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsCreepMaterials scienceAlloyMetallurgyAluminiumCastingAlonizingDiesel fuelAutomotive engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diesel engines in heavy-duty vehicles are predicted to maintain a stable presence in the future due to the difficulty of electrifying heavy trucks, mine equipment, and railway cars. This trend encourages the effort to develop new aluminum alloy systems with improved performance at diesel engine conditions of elevated temperature and stress combinations to reduce vehicle weight and, consequently, CO2 emissions. Aluminum alloys need to provide adequate creep resistance at ~300 °C and room-temperature tensile properties better than the current commercial aluminum alloys used for powertrain applications. The studies for improving creep resistance for aluminum casting alloys indicate that their high-temperature stability depends on the formation of high-density uniform dispersoids with low solid solubility and low diffusivity in aluminum. This review summarizes three generations of diesel engine aluminum alloys and focuses on recent work on the third-generation dispersoid-strengthened alloys. Additionally, new trends in developing creep resistance through the development of alloy systems other than Al-Si-based alloys, the optimization of manufacturing processes, and the use of thermal barrier coatings and composites are discussed. New progress on concepts regarding the thermal stability of rapidly solidified and nano-structured alloys and on creep-resistant alloy design via machine learning-based algorithms is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterialsSame topicAluminum Alloys Composites PropertiesFrench-language works237,207