MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The change of renewable energy and zero-carbon economy in an anthropogenically warming climate

2024· article· en· W4399979526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhengyang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Computational Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyGlobal warmingFossil fuelClimate changeNatural resource economicsGreenhouse gasEconomicsEnvironmental scienceRenewable fuelsEconomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anthropogenetic global warming has led to increasingly significant environmental issues, biodiversity losses, and socioeconomic impacts. There is a rising demand for transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy (RE), reducing carbon emissions, and thus realizing zero-carbon economy. Nevertheless, it remains a challenge to achieve the carbon-free economy and mitigate global warming, without fully understanding the ongoing RE development. The major objectives of this research are to (1) investigate the changes of different RE types compared with fossil fuels in the U.S., U.K., Mexico, Canada, and China; (2) examine the relationships between RE, temperature anomalies, and GDP; and (3) propose potential strategies for zero-carbon economy and climate change. The annual mean energy, temperature, and GDP data in these five selected countries during 1980 to 2021 are collected for analysis, and their relation-ships are addressed through Pearson's correlation analysis, along with significance test. The results suggest an increasing trend of RE and rising RE-fossil fuels ratio during the past four decades. All five countries either showed exponential or linear increasing trends in GDP and RE. The correlation analysis suggests a significantly positive correlation between RE and GDP in both countries. For example, different from the U.S., the synchronized growth in RE and fossil fuels in China leads to a significantly positive correlation between these two. All five countries provide their unique data of renewable development, which can stimulate the research and enable further study. This study will shed light over possible strategic plans for an optimized use of renewable energy, ensuring below 1.5°C temperature rise, and reaching carbon neutrality by 2050.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied and Computational EngineeringSame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207