MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399979693 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.140304

Proposal for the Rehabilitation of Houseshold in Seismic Vulnerability Zones

2024· article· en· W4399979693 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVulnerability (computing)RehabilitationForensic engineeringGeologyComputer scienceEngineeringComputer securityMedicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Worldwide earthquakes have caused a total of 719,501 human victim and 1,344.8 billion dollars in economic losses between 2000-2021.The Santa Elena province (Ecuador) is classified as an area of high seismic danger, according to the Ecuadorian Construction Standard (NEC).This coastal province has 70% of informal housing construction, structural problems and poor construction processes can be seen with the occurrence of these natural phenomena.This study aims to propose technical-economic rehabilitation solutions in informal housing constructions, through modelling and structural analysis, that guarantee occupational safety and the recovery of the structural capacity of the housing, case study (pilot).The applied methodology consisted of four phases: i) information on the pilot case study and its environment; review of the building regulations, ii) laboratory tests on soil characteristics, iii) structural modelling and analysis using SAP2000 software, and iv) structural support and rehabilitation solutions.The results indicate that the columns of the first floor require reinforcement because the average cross-section of the columns is less than the local construction regulations and defined by the criteria of experts in the construction sector.The structural elements of the second floor also require repair to reduce bending moments and distribute loads to the ground.The idea of innovation is the configuration of a protocol with construction methods for existing and new buildings, as tools for local authorities to promote reinforcement in areas of high seismic vulnerability, and thus a territorial order in the construction sector.This research recommends structural rehabilitation with reinforcements and structural repairs to guarantee its ability to withstand an earthquake and ensure the occupational well-being of inhabitants.This methodology can be replicated in houses with similar structural characteristics in Ecuadorian coast, considering SDGs 3, 9, and 11, which address health and well-being, industry, innovation and infrastructure, and sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it