MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399982372 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.140313

An Efficient Lightweight Authentication and Access Control for IoT Edge Devices

2024· article· en· W4399982372 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Imane Zerraza, Zianou Ahmed Seghir, Mounir Hemam

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccess controlEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionAuthentication (law)Internet of ThingsComputer scienceComputer securityEdge computingComputer networkEmbedded systemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of Internet of Things (IoT) technology brings tremendous benefits to people's lives and work.However, the integration of IoT devices into diverse systems has underscored the pressing issue of security.Safeguarding data confidentiality in IoT systems necessitates the implementation of strong security measures, including authentication, encryption and access control mechanisms.When effectively employed, these measures pave the way for the development of an efficient and secure IoT system, offering substantial benefits to end-users.This paper introduces a novel authentication and access control solution tailored for IoT edge devices.Our suggested approach is applicable to the edge network comprising numerous nodes, enabling the transmission of extensive data within constrained bandwidth based on lightweight symmetric cryptography since it uses Chacha20 algorithm to establishing session key, and maintaining the protocol of identity management and access control more precisely through HoBAC and blockchain technology.We have successfully analyzed the protocol correctness using the scyther tool.The results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed protocol compared to alternative approaches, particularly in terms of communication and time costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207