Estimation of bed material transport in gravel‐bed streams using the virtual velocity approach: Insights from the North‐Western Himalayas, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study focuses on evaluating the sediment mobility and transport patterns in two Himalayan rivers (Aglar and Paligad Rivers) during monsoon and non‐monsoon flows. The virtual velocity approach involving the measurements of the bed proportional mobility ( Y ), active layer depth ( d s ), displacement length and virtual velocity of mobilized grains was employed. Both local (0.5 m subsections) and wetted cross‐sectional average parameters were used. While using local parameters the total annual bed material transport was estimated to be 67 100 (±20 400 t) and 18 400 t (±6000 t) in the Aglar and Paligad Rivers, respectively. Of this, nearly 60% of transport occurred during the monsoon and the overall contribution of partial transport (PT) remained low (<6%). However, based on cross‐section average parameters, total transport was estimated to be 42 300 (±15 800 t) and 12 200 t (±4700 t), in Aglar and Paligad, respectively, with nearly 79% and 68% occurring during the monsoon. Moreover, the contribution of PT increased to nearly 18% and 29% for the Aglar and Paligad Rivers, respectively. Additionally, the dependence of PT on Y and full transport on d s results in an abrupt shift in transport rates at the transition from partial to full transport, causing discontinuity in transport curves. Therefore, a unified function was proposed to represent the extent of transport for both partial and full transport, yielding continuous transport curves. These findings are particularly relevant for efficient river management as the region houses several hydropower plants and is highly vulnerable to climate change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".