MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399986025 · doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2024)771

Low seed viability of a rare aster

2024· article· en· W4399986025 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joy Handley, Lusha M. Tronstad

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pollination Ecology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection RadiometerBiologyBotanyBiotechnologyGeographyRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reproductive ecology of rare plants is often unknown, yet the persistence of most plant populations depends on successful interactions with pollinators and favourable environmental conditions. Sexual reproduction maintains genetic diversity within plant populations using pollinators to transport pollen grains among plants of the same species and producing seeds. We investigated the reproduction of Yermo xanthocephalus Dorn (Desert yellowhead), a perennial member of Asteraceae endemic to central Wyoming, USA, which grows in only two locations within 8 km of each other. Our objectives were to assess the pollination and seed-set of Y. xanthocephalus. We conducted seed-set experiments in both populations to measure self-pollination and estimate if pollinating insects limited seed production. We used vane traps and pan traps to capture pollinators, and we examined pollen carried on bees. Yermo xanthocephalus can self-pollinate, but seed-set was extremely low. The number of viable seeds produced in flowerheads pollinated by insects did not differ from those produced by capitula hand-pollinated with excess pollen, indicating that pollinators did not limit seed production that year. Pollen from Y. xanthocephalus was carried by nine bee genera, suggesting that no one specific insect pollinates this plant. Only 12% of ovules produced viable seeds in the main population and 0% were viable in the other population, suggesting that something beyond pollinators limited seed-set. We recommend continued research to address what is limiting seed production to advance the knowledge and management of this declining plant species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pollination EcologySame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207