MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399990477 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3418650

Joint Sensing, Communications, and Computing Design for 6G URLLC Service-Oriented MEC Networks

2024· article· en· W4399990477 on OpenAlexafffund
Dang Van Huynh, Saeed R. Khosravirad, Simon L. Cotton, Thang X. Vu, Octavia A. Dobre, Hyundong Shin, Trung Q. Duong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of KoreaCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgCanada Research ChairsNational Research Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceJoint (building)Computer networkService (business)TelecommunicationsDistributed computingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The convergence of advanced communication technologies and powerful computing architecture has unlocked a plethora of opportunities for Internet-of-Things applications. To fully realize this potential, a synergistic design encompassing sensing, computing, and communication is crucial. This article investigates these critical technologies to facilitate service-oriented systems by minimizing end-to-end latency and the number of deployed services at edge servers in mobile edge computing, all within the confines of stringent ultrareliable and low-latency communication requirements and system budget constraints. The addressed optimization problem takes into account variables, such as service placement strategies, task offloading portions, and bandwidth allocation. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of our solution and highlight the impact of key parameters on system performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicMolecular Communication and NanonetworksFrench-language works237,207