MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399990560 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2024.3418429

Ocean Remote Sensing Using Spaceborne GNSS-Reflectometry: A Review

2024· review· en· W4399990560 on OpenAlexaff
Jinwei Bu, Qiulan Wang, Linghui Li, Xiaoqing Zuo, Kegen Yu, Weimin Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRemote sensingComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spaceborne global navigation satellite system reflectometry (GNSS-R) is an emerging remote sensing technology that utilizes Earth surface reflections of GNSS signals to monitor geophysical parameters. With its unique advantages of high spatiotemporal resolution, low observational cost, wide coverage, and all-weather operation, GNSS-R has found extensive applications in ocean remote sensing. Recent successful launches of spaceborne GNSS-R platforms, such as TechDemoSat-1 in 2014, Cyclone GNSS in 2016, BuFeng-1 A/B in 2019, and FengYun-3E in 2021, have opened up new opportunities in this field. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the latest advancements in the application of spaceborne GNSS-R in ocean remote sensing. It covers satellite missions related to spaceborne GNSS-R and explores various methods and techniques for ocean remote sensing applications, including sea surface wind mapping, hurricanes, typhoons, and tropical cyclones monitoring, tsunamis and storm surges detection, sea surface altimetry and wave height measurement, sea ice sensing, and rainfall estimation, among others. Furthermore, the article discusses the challenges, prospects, and future outlook of spaceborne GNSS-R.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207