Richard Whitford’s Humanism and Monastic Renewal: Birgittine Spirituality and the New Learning in <i>The Pype, or Tonne, of the Lyfe of Perfection</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Richard Whitford’s 1532 Pype, or Tonne, of the Lyfe of Perfection provides a thoroughgoing defence of monastic life against evangelical reformers; however, this text is equally remarkable for its comprehensive program of monastic renewal. What was needed, according to the Birgittine author, is regeneration from the ground up. Whitford’s reforming vision stands out primarily on account of its solid pedagogical foundation. In place of critique, The Pype offers detailed practical and theoretical foundations for living and reforming religious life that blend the Birgittine spirituality in which he immersed himself at Syon Abbey with early sixteenth-century humanism that he encountered at university and cherished through his association with Erasmus and Thomas More. In doing so, he marries a spirituality that unites learning and reform with a commitment to the value of source texts, the importance of citation, the origins of specific religious practices, and the need to understand the ancients on their own terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".