MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400001672 · doi:10.1364/prj.515222

Experimental demonstration of a silicon nanophotonic antenna for far-field broadened optical phased arrays

2024· article· en· W4400001672 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotonics Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaOptiwave Systems (Canada)Wilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOpticsPhased arrayAntenna (radio)Beam steeringOptoelectronicsAntenna arrayNanophotonicsMaterials sciencePhysicsComputer scienceBeam (structure)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical antennas play a pivotal role in interfacing integrated photonic circuits with free-space systems. Designing antennas for optical phased arrays ideally requires achieving compact antenna apertures, wide radiation angles, and high radiation efficiency all at once, which presents a significant challenge. Here, we experimentally demonstrate a novel ultra-compact silicon grating antenna, utilizing subwavelength grating nanostructures arranged in a transversally interleaved topology to control the antenna radiation pattern. Through near-field phase engineering, we increase the antenna’s far-field beam width beyond the Fraunhofer limit for a given aperture size. The antenna incorporates a single-etch grating and a Bragg reflector implemented on a 300-nm-thick silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform. Experimental characterizations demonstrate a beam width of 44°×52° with −3.22 dB diffraction efficiency, for an aperture size of 3.4 μm ×1.78 μm . Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, a novel topology of a 2D antenna array is demonstrated for the first time, leveraging evanescently coupled architecture to yield a very compact antenna array. We validated the functionality of our antenna design through its integration into this new 2D array topology. Specifically, we demonstrate a small proof-of-concept two-dimensional optical phased array with 2×4 elements and a wide beam steering range of 19.3º × 39.7º. A path towards scalability and larger-scale integration is also demonstrated on the antenna array of 8×20 elements with a transverse beam steering of 31.4º.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it