MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400003080 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.190311

Optimizing the Nonlinear Response of Elliptical Tubular Composite Beams Using SVM

2024· article· en· W4400003080 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qusay W. Ahmed, Raquim N. Zehawi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComposite numberNonlinear systemMaterials scienceSupport vector machineStructural engineeringComposite materialEngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear behavior of elliptical concrete filled steel tubular (ECFST) beams was investigated in this work to optimize and model the effect of different parameters.ANSYS computer program has been used to analyze the three-dimensional models.The nonlinear material and geometrical analysis based on incremental iterative load method, is adopted.Parametric studies were carried out to identify the influence of key parameters on the behavior of moment (M) versus lateral displacement (Δ) relationship and effect of these parameters on strength index.These parameters include effect of thickness of steel tube, compressive strength of concrete, yielding strength of steel tube, shear span to depth ratio, and aspect ratio.It is concluded that the moment carrying capacity and strength index are increased as thickness, ′ , , and aspect ratio are increased.Meanwhile increasing shear span to depth ratio bring down the moment carrying capacity and strength index.The numerical analysis was integrated with artificial intelligence techniques Neural Network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) through the representation of the required number of models accomplished by adopting the ANSYS program, then using the generated data as inputs for ANN and SVM to developed the prediction model, these steps was verified to ensure the precise results.Finally, the results obtained through the parametric study was introduced to (ANN) model reflect high correlation (98.5%) with low root mean square error (0.043-0.185), and for (SVM) model reviled high correlation (98.3%) with minimal root mean square error (0.049-0.088).Both techniques were accurate but SVM was more reliable in term of minimal errors.The results of this innovative integrated approach proved the ability of achieving responses prediction for different sampling with low cost and sufficient accuracy for the design and analysis of ECFST beams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207