MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400011630 · doi:10.18280/jesa.570312

Fuzzy Logic Control for High-Frequency Switching in Photovoltaic SEPIC DC/DC Converters and Three-Phase Inverters

2024· article· en· W4400011630 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Teerawut Savangboon, Akharakit Chaithanakulwat, Nuttee Thungsuk, Thaweesak Tanaram, Papol Sardyoung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersPhotovoltaic systemControl theory (sociology)Fuzzy logicThree-phaseComputer scienceElectronic engineeringControl (management)Electrical engineeringEngineeringVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research paper focuses on the application of fuzzy logic control in the high-frequency switching control of SEPIC DC/DC converters and three-phase inverters for photovoltaic systems.The research is separated into two distinct sections.The first part entails the design and development of a prototype mechanism for a single-ended primary-inductor converter (SEPIC), which is utilized to manage the input voltage from the PV system.The operation of this SEPIC DC/DC converter incorporates real-time fuzzy logic control principles and methods.The second part involves the design and creation of a three-phase inverter mechanism (SVPWM) responsible for driving a three-phase induction motor.In a similar manner, fuzzy logic control principles and methods are independently employed for the operation control of this three-phase inverter.Both control mechanisms are integrated with the mathematical model of MATLAB/Simulink program and synchronized with the TMS320F28379D microcontroller in order to effectively regulate their respective functions.The evaluation and experimentation of the developed mechanisms demonstrate the successful regulation of input and output voltages for the SEPIC DC/DC Converter, as well as the efficient control of the three-phase induction motor's speed, torque, and power using the three-phase inverter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207