Supplier Selection Analysis for Sand Materials Using AHP in the Indonesian Manufacturing Industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analysis of supplier selection aims to identify suppliers that best match an organization's specific needs.In the past, an Indonesian manufacturing enterprise relied solely on price as a criterion for selecting suppliers, overlooking other important factors.This study employs a qualitative approach using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to select suppliers of sand raw materials.A geometric mean algorithm calculates eigenvalues and ranks the suppliers based on various criteria.The evaluation is based on the vendor performance indicator (VPI) criteria, which include quality, cost, lead time, flexibility, and responsiveness.The findings indicate the following global weightings for each supplier: Supplier U (0.224), Supplier V (0.327), Supplier W (0.197), Supplier X (0.123), Supplier Y (0.052), and Supplier Z (0.077).From this assessment, Supplier V is identified as the most suitable vendor for raw sand materials.Consequently, the enterprise should consider selecting Supplier V as its primary supplier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".