Preemptive Prediction-Based Placement of Time-Critical SFCs With VNF Sharing at the Edge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The demand for ultra-low latency requirements is fueled by the growing popularity of real-time and time-critical applications such as virtual, augmented, and mixed reality, and industrial IoT. Time-critical applications and services are real-time software whose failure could result in catastrophic consequences such as fatalities, damage to property, and even financial losses. Edge computing is the main enabler of 5G ultra-low latency use cases. Edge resources are limited compared to abundant cloud computing resources. As such, provisioning time-critical applications at the edge is more challenging and demanding. Even though virtual network function (VNF) sharing improves the utilization of the service providers’ resources, service requests, including time-critical ones, can still be rejected due to insufficient resources. This paper proposes a Preemptive Prediction-based Placement scheme (PPPS) for time-critical services with VNF sharing. In addition to prioritizing time-critical premium (Pr) services over best-effort (BE) services, PPPS utilizes the predicted required resources in a defined lookahead window. In cases when no resources are available for Pr services, a preemption mechanism preempts resources for the Pr service, by deporting one or more running BE services. The experimental results show that PPPS can reduce the Pr services rejection rate to ~0% while minimizing the disturbance that BE services witness such as prolonged waiting times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".