MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400026926 · doi:10.1306/10192321180

High-precision seismic imaging for complex deep structures in the hydrocarbon exploration using a coherent-stacking-based least-squares migration

2024· article· en· W4400026926 on OpenAlexaff
Jidong Yang, Jianping Huang, Tengfei Lin, Zhenchun Li, Liang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStackingHydrocarbon explorationSeismologyGeophysical imagingLeast-squares function approximationPetrologyTectonicsStatisticsNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT With the rapid development of the petroleum industry, oil and gas exploration gradually changes from conventional shallow and middle-depth reservoirs to deep and ultradeep reservoirs. In western China, especially in the Tarim Basin, the deep Ordovician and ultradeep Cambrian carbonate is the most important hydrocarbon reservoir. But because of complex near-surface conditions and complicated subsurface structures, high-precision seismic imaging for such deep and ultradeep reservoirs is still challenging with the state-of-art migration methods. One of the critical factors is that the reflections from deep and ultradeep strata cannot be coherently stacked in the migration because of accumulative traveltime errors caused by an inaccurate velocity model. To mitigate this issue, we present a coherent-stack-based least-squares migration (LSM) approach to improve the imaging quality for deep and ultradeep structures. Unlike traditional LSM that uses the stacked gradient during iterations, the proposed method updates the reflectivity model in the subsurface half-opening angle domain and then applies a coherent stacking to implement constructive summation for angle-domain common-image gathers. The new LSM scheme enables us to reduce the artifacts caused by an inaccurate velocity model and produces high-quality images for deep and ultradeep strata. Two models with typical steep-dipping faults, overthrust folds, and fault-karst carbonate reservoirs are designed to test the feasibility of the proposed method, and a field data set from a land survey is used to demonstrate its adaptability for low signal-to-noise ratio data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAPG BulletinSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207