MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400027418 · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad5c18

Modeling and analysis of single-mode widely tunable all-fiber Ho-doped CW master oscillator power amplifier system

2024· article· en· W4400027418 on OpenAlexaff
Jawad Mirza, Umair Ahmad Salaria, Salman Ghafoor, Ahmad Atieh, Benish Kanwal, Ahmad Almogren, Imran Aziz

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica Scripta · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsPower (physics)Materials scienceFiberMode (computer interface)Single-mode optical fiberDopingOptoelectronicsPhysicsOpticsOptical fiberComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the design of an all-fiber single-mode polarization maintaining widely tunable Ho-doped master oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) system operating in the wavelength range of 2005-2135 nm based on a pre-amplifier and two power amplification stages. The single clad Ho-doped active fibers in the ring cavity based master oscillator, pre-amplifier, and power amplifiers are pumped using 1950 nm semiconductor laser diode pump sources. The amplification of the MOPA system is investigated over the entire spectral range of 2005-2135 nm. The highest output power achieved by the continuous wave (CW) Ho-doped MOPA system is 43 W at a wavelength of 2028.6 nm using pump power of 20 W with power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 90% for second power amplifier while the total pump power of Ho-doped MOPA system is 45 W. Optical bandpass filters (OBPFs) are employed between different stages of MOPA system to enable amplification over the wider spectral range of 2005-2135 nm by suppressing the amplified spontaneous emission (ASE). Not using OBPFs results in amplification that is limited to the spectral range of 2045-2130 nm. Therefore, a penalty of 45 nm can be avoided at the expense of using the OBPFs between different stages of MOPA system. This flexible MOPA system can be used in multiple applications, especially for space-borne high power transmitters operating in atmospheric transmission windows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica ScriptaSame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207