Heat dissipation measurement in flip-chip package using microfabricated temperature sensors on lid
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resistance Temperature Detectors (RTD) were intricately microfabricated onto a lid, presenting a pioneering approach to improve Junction-to-Case thermal resistance measurements on electronic packages. Traditionally, those involve intrusive lid drilling and cold plate grooving to accommodate the thermocouples integration as stated in JEDEC JESD51 standards. In lieu of this intrusive practice, microfabricated RTDs were adopted. A configuration of twelve RTDs was carefully distributed throughout the thermally active surface of an actual lid, offering a markedly less obtrusive measurement approach while enhancing temperature distribution and precision. Integration of these sensors to the lid surface, albeit inherently rough, was addressed through a spray coating planarization technique, effectively diminishing surface roughness without impinging on functionality. Results attest the functionality of RTDs across a temperature range from 20 to 105 degrees Celsius, exhibiting linear performance characteristics. The comprehensive analysis of sensor responses is detailed within this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it