Closed-form analytical relationships for pentamode metamaterials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pentamode metamaterials are a class of extremal materials exhibiting fluid-like mechanical behavior . The mechanical properties of pentamode metamaterials arise from their unique micro-architecture, rather than their constituent material. In this research, we present closed-form analytical relationships for the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of pentamode lattice structures with double-cone struts based on cubic diamond morphology. To validate our analytical solutions, we performed numerical simulations and experimental tests, which confirmed the accuracy of the derived relationships. Our findings indicate that increasing the smaller diameter ( d ) and the larger-to-smaller diameter ratio ( α ) of the double-cones increases the elastic modulus of pentamode metamaterials. However, within the considered range of d and α , the Poisson’s ratio is nearly constant and lies within the range of approximately 0.5. These analytical relationships provide valuable insight into the mechanical behavior of pentamode metamaterials, which can aid in the design and optimization of new materials with unique properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it