MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400041392 · doi:10.18280/ts.410348

Improving Built-up Extraction Using Spectral Indices and Machine Learning on Sentinel-2 Satellite Data in Mumbai Suburban District, India

2024· article· en· W4400041392 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtraction (chemistry)SatelliteRemote sensingComputer scienceGeographyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Built-up mapping possesses a great challenge owing to the varying spectral signatures and spatial attributes of different features such as buildings, individual houses, roads, etc.Here, the key challenge is to separate built-up class and bare/fallow land class due to the spectral signature similarity.The objectives of this study are as follows: (i) to extract built-up features using spectral bands and twelve popular spectral indices using advanced machine learning techniques and analyzing the change in accuracy after integrating selected spectral indices in the classification, (ii) separability analysis of built-up class and bare/fallow land using the Spectral Discrimination Index (SDI) and histogram plots for selected indices.(iii) the performance of the advanced ensemble classifier, extreme gradient boosting, is compared to other well-known machine learning techniques, such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and K-nearest neighbors (KNN).Two datasets were used: Dataset-1 was formed by performing stacking operation on four bands at 10 m spatial resolution.Dataset-2 was prepared by computing twelve spectral indices and integrating them with Dataset-1.The results indicated that extreme gradient boosting method obtained highest overall accuracy and kappa value of 88.90%, 0.848 for Dataset-1, and 94.30%, 0.922 for Dataset-2, respectively.The overall accuracy for Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and KNN is 88.23%, 87.05%, and 86.60% for Dataset-1, and 93.04%, 91.04%, and 89.93% for Dataset-2, respectively.There is a significant rise of 4.81% (Random Forest), 3.99% (Support Vector Machine), 3.33% (KNN), and 5.40% (extreme gradient boosting) in overall accuracy for the fused dataset has been observed.The outcome of this study suggest that the Enhanced Normalized Difference Impervious Surfaces Index (ENDISI) and Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) are very useful spectral indices for mapping of built-up with a higher degree of separability for built-up and bare/fallow land separation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it