Vehicle Type and Speed Detection on Android Devices Using YOLO V5 and MobileNet
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vehicle-type detection tool has many applications in transportation, traffic control, guiding and controlling unmanned vehicles, tolls and road taxes, traffic violations, smuggling detection, etc.In the proposed version, the MobileNet neural network and the YOLO V5 algorithm are integrated.In this integration, the YOLO V5 algorithm replaces the convolutional layers of the neural network and the neural network be used for the classification of vehicles.The Kivy library is employed to transform the developed algorithm into an Android application.The data used in this study consists of two datasets: The ImageNet database and a constructed database.The proposed method results show improvement in increasing the accuracy of vehicle detection, reducing the computational load, detection accuracy in different weather conditions, separating overlapping cars.Various methods are presented for better neural network training and reducing neural network size.The reason for these capabilities is the use of developed algorithms and the use of techniques such as data augmentation, spatial filtering, and distillation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it