MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400042733 · doi:10.18280/ts.410327

Building Energy Efficiency Analysis and Diagnosis Using Integrated Image Processing and Thermal Imaging Technologies

2024· article· en· W4400042733 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shuling Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage processingEfficient energy useThermalComputer scienceComputer visionImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the continuous growth of global energy demand and escalating environmental issues, enhancing building energy efficiency has become a critical challenge for many countries.Buildings, as major energy consumers, require precise energy efficiency analysis and diagnosis to achieve energy conservation and emission reduction goals.In recent years, the application of image processing and thermal imaging technologies in building energy efficiency analysis has become increasingly widespread.These technologies provide accurate energy efficiency assessments, aiding in the identification and resolution of energy efficiency issues within buildings.However, existing methods face numerous challenges in handling complex thermal imaging data and segmenting energy efficiency states, often failing to comprehensively reflect the actual energy performance of buildings.This paper proposes a novel approach to building energy efficiency analysis and diagnosis by integrating image processing and thermal imaging technologies.The approach comprises two main components.First, a selection search algorithm tailored for building infrared thermal images is introduced to enhance the precision and efficiency of thermal image processing.Second, a new method for segmenting building energy efficiency states is proposed, utilizing the (SHapley Additive exPlanations) SHAP attribution clustering algorithm to provide a more comprehensive and accurate evaluation of building energy performance.These advancements address the limitations of existing methods and offer new technical means for building energy efficiency analysis.The proposed approach not only improves the precision of energy efficiency assessments but also has significant application value and potential for widespread adoption.This research contributes to the ongoing efforts in energy conservation and provides a robust framework for future studies in building energy efficiency diagnostics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicInfrared Target Detection MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207