MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400046454 · doi:10.1016/j.shj.2024.100336

Moderate Aortic Stenosis With Cardiac Damage: A New Type of Severe Aortic Stenosis

2024· review· en· W4400046454 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Heart · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersEdwards Lifesciences
KeywordsStenosisCardiologyMedicineInternal medicineVentricleRisk stratificationAortic valve stenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The clinical implications of severe aortic stenosis have been well established. Understanding of moderate aortic stenosis, however, continues to evolve. Athough moderate aortic stenosis may be less clinically impactful in patients with normal ventricular function, it may carry prognostic significance in those patients with a ventricle exhibiting signs of cardiac damage. Moderate aortic stenosis in the presence of cardiac damage or dysfunction may be prognostically comparable to that of severe aortic stenosis. Extravalvular risk parameters can inform aortic stenosis risk stratification. Three ongoing trials seek to evaluate transcatheter aortic valve assessment in patients with moderate aortic stenosis and signs of cardiac damage or left ventricular dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it