MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400050261 · doi:10.4236/tel.2024.143053

Local Tax Determinants an Unbalanced Panel Data Analysis: Evidence in Moroccan Municipalities

2024· article· en· W4400050261 on OpenAlexaff
Lina Benabdellah, Othmane Fahim

Bibliographic record

VenueTheoretical Economics Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersFP7 International Cooperation
KeywordsPanel dataLocal governmentTax revenueEconomicsRevenuePublic economicsEconometric analysisEconometric modelTax reformPopulationEconometricsGeographyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research identifies the factors influencing local taxation across eight municipalities in Morocco using an unbalanced panel data set. This study is based on two econometric models: random and fixed effects models and examines the effects of various factors such as the professional tax (PT), the housing tax (HT), the tax on municipal services (MST), the population (Pop), the density (Density) and other tax and fees (OTFs) on the evolution of local tax. The findings underscore the importance of considering not only central government factors but also local dynamics to understand and predict the evolution of local tax revenue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheoretical Economics LettersSame topicFiscal Policy and Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207