MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400051599 · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000002237

Female Adnexal Tumor of Probable Wolffian Origin (Wolffian Tumor)

2024· article· en· W4400051599 on OpenAlexaff
Kianoosh Keyhanian, Tanner Mack, Erna Forgó, Henry D. Tazelaar, Teri A. Longacre

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesonephric ductPathologyBiologyCuboidal CellImmunohistochemistryMesotheliomaAnatomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wolffian tumor and its nosologic relative, the recently defined STK11 adnexal tumor are rare neoplasms thought to arise from mesonephric remnants. These tumors typically arise in the broad ligament, fallopian tube, and ovarian hilum and although most are associated with a good prognosis, up to 50% of STK11 adnexal tumors demonstrate aggressive clinical behavior. The chief differential diagnoses include endometrioid adenocarcinoma and sex cord stromal tumors. However, the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of these tumors exhibit considerable overlap with peritoneal mesothelioma. To fully characterize their immunophenotypic signature, we examined a total of 21 cases (18 Wolffian and 3 STK11 adnexal tumors) with standard markers used in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Morphologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features were reviewed and additional IHC performed for cases with available material. Patient age ranged from 25 to 73 (mean: 51) years. Sites included adnexa/broad ligament (6, 28%), paratubal (5, 24%), ovary/paraovarian (5, 24%), tubal (intraluminal) (2, 9.5%), pelvis (2, 9.5%), and liver (1, 5%). The mean tumor size was 9.3 cm (range: 0.2 to 22 cm). The histomorphology in most cases (14/21, 66%) consisted of tubular to solid sheets of neoplastic cells lined by columnar to cuboidal cells containing uniform round to oval nuclei. Compressed tubules with slit-like lumens and sieve-like pattern were also seen in at least 7 (33%) cases. Three cases demonstrated interanastomosing cords and trabeculae of epithelioid cells with cribriform and microacinar patterns growing within prominent myxoid stroma as described in STK11 adnexal tumors. In the cases with available IHC for 3 mesothelial markers (calretinin, WT1, D2-40), 55.5% (5 of 9) showed reactivity with all 3 markers. In cases with at least 2 available mesothelial markers, 69% (11/16) were positive for 2 markers (mostly calretinin and WT1). Claudin-4, MOC31, and BER-EP4 were negative in most cases tested (78% [7/9], 71.4% [5/7], and 100% [6/6], respectively). Given the resemblance to mesothelioma, there was initial strong consideration and/or actual misdiagnosis of mesothelioma in 3 cases (14%). In summary, the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of Wolffian tumor and its recently defined relative, STK11 adnexal tumor, can lead to misdiagnosis of mesothelioma, particularly when encountered in the disseminated or metastatic setting. Wolffian tumor and STK11 adnexal tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all pelvic and peritoneal mesotheliomas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207