MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400056861 · doi:10.1101/2024.06.24.24309437

Unveiling the Longitudinal Journey: Three-Year Follow-up of Women with MINOCA and INOCA in a Specialized Heart Centre

2024· preprint· en· W4400056861 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emilie T. Théberge, E. Burden, Katrina Leung, Mahraz Parvand, Natasha Prodan‐Bhalla, Karin H. Humphries, Tara Sedlak

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsB.C. Women's Hospital & Health CentreVancouver Coastal HealthUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLongitudinal studyMedicineHistoryDemographyGerontologySociologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) and ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA), are female predominant conditions, with a lack of clinical trials guiding medical management for the common underlying vasomotor etiologies. Long-term outcomes of (M)INOCA patients following attendance at a women’s heart center (WHC) are lacking. Methods Women diagnosed with MINOCA (n=51) or INOCA (n=112) were prospectively followed for 3 years at the Vancouver WHC. Baseline characteristics, diagnoses, chest pain type, major adverse cardiac events, hospital encounters, medications, and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) responses were compared between baseline and 3 years. Chi-squared tests were used to compare categorical variables, with Students’ t-tests for continuous variables. Results MINOCA patients had significantly more non-exertional chest pain and diagnoses of vasospasm than INOCA patients, who had more exertional chest pain and diagnoses of coronary microvascular dysfunction. Following baseline, both groups had significant reductions in cardiovascular emergency room visits, with INOCA patients also experiencing fewer cardiovascular hospitalizations. At 3 years, the most commonly prescribed medications were calcium channel blockers, long-acting nitrates and beta blockers, with MINOCA having more acetylsalicylic acid and INOCA more short-acting nitrates and ranolazine prescriptions. Both groups observed significant improvements in SAQ scores, with greater improvements observed in INOCA patients. Patients with depression or prescribed ranolazine at 3 years had worse SAQ scores at baseline. Conclusions Three-year outcomes of (M)INOCA patients indicate that the WHC’s comprehensive care model effectively improves diagnostic clarity, reduces hospital encounters, optimizes medication management, and improves self-reported patient well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207