Ambient exposure to fine particulate matter with oxidative potential affects oxidative stress biomarkers in pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prenatal exposures to ambient particulate matter (PM2.5) from traffic may generate oxidative stress and thus contribute to adverse birth outcomes. We investigated whether PM2.5 constituents from brake and tire wear affect levels of oxidative stress biomarkers (malondialdehyde [MDA], 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine [8-OHdG]) using urine samples collected up to 3 times during pregnancy in 156 women recruited from antenatal clinics at the University of California Los Angeles. Land use regression models with co-kriging were employed to estimate average residential outdoor concentrations of black carbon (BC), PM2.5 mass, PM2.5 metal components, and 3 PM2.5 oxidative potential metrics during the 4 weeks prior to urine sample collection. The 8-OHdG concentrations in mid-pregnancy increased by 24.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0-42.8) and 14.3% (95% CI, 0.4%-30.0%) per interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM2.5 mass and BC, respectively. The brake wear marker (barium) and the oxidative potential metrics were associated with increased MDA concentration in the first sample collected (10-17 gestational week), but 95% CIs included the null. Traffic-related air pollution contributed in early to mid-pregnancy to oxidative stress generation previously linked to adverse birth outcomes. This article is part of a Special Collection on Environmental Epidemiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".