Terahertz Components by Additive Manufacturing: Material and Fabrication Characterizations Realized Through Bragg Structures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work explores Bragg structures and superstructures for the terahertz regime that are 3-D printed with two filament materials, i.e., high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) and cyclic olefin copolymer (COC). We show underlying frequency responses that come about due to the material absorption and chosen 3-D printing resolution. A terahertz time-domain spectroscopy analysis shows the favorable low absorption coefficient of COC filament material compared to that of HIPS filament material. Through a demonstration of terahertz Bragg superstructures for both HIPS and COC filament material, we show the contrast in performance and mitigation of undesired absorption for a terahertz photonic element made from COC filament material. The experimental results show agreement with a finite-difference time-domain simulation of the terahertz Bragg superstructures. Through a demonstration of terahertz Bragg structures for both HIPS and COC filament material, we show the effect of printing resolution (over 50–400 μm range) of the terahertz spectral response. Terahertz Bragg structures and superstructures made from COC filament material show great promise for rapid prototyping of terahertz photonic elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it