MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400066539 · doi:10.32372/chjs.15-01-05

Unveiling patterns and trends in research on cumulative damage models for statistical and reliability analyses: Bibliometric and thematic explorations with data analytics

2024· article· en· W4400066539 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Víctor Leiva, Cecília Castro, Roberto Vila, Helton Saulo

Bibliographic record

VenueChilean Journal of Statistics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCHIST-ERAConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloUniversidade do MinhoAgenția Națională pentru Cercetare și Dezvoltare
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Thematic mapData scienceAnalyticsComputer scienceData analysisStatisticsData miningGeographyCartographyMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study comprehensively explores the research landscape within statistical and reliability studies, focusing on the Birnbaum-Saunders distribution, Gaussian inverse distribution, cumulative damage models, and fatigue life prediction.Using a combination of bibliometric analysis, network visualization, thematic mapping, and latent Dirichlet allocation, we analyze 465 articles from the ISI Web of Science database.These articles were selected for their relevance based on a targeted search strategy.Our analysis identifies key trends, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes.Notable growth in scholarly activity was observed from 2015 to 2021, with a peak around 2021, followed by a decline in the number of publications.Relevant contributions were noted from countries such as Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Iran, Japan, and the United States.The thematic analysis of keywords reveals influential motor themes like the Birnbaum-Saunders distribution and expectation-maximization algorithm; specialized niche areas such as producer risk; emerging or declining themes like the generalized Birnbaum-Saunders distribution; and foundational themes including cumulative damage and fatigue life distributions.A cluster analysis states key focus areas, such as material durability and advanced statistical methods.Integrating latent Dirichlet allocation, six main topics are derived, capturing broad thematic structures.However, some niche areas do not align directly due to their specialized nature and limited cross-field impact.These findings map the current research on this thematic and suggest future research directions, including deeper exploration of niche themes, integration of advanced statistical methods in practical applications, and increased collaboration across diverse research areas to enhance the robustness and applicability of reliability models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.1080.137
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.325
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChilean Journal of StatisticsSame topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207