MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400066938 · doi:10.1088/2634-4386/ad5c97

Efficient sparse spiking auto-encoder for reconstruction, denoising and classification

2024· article· en· W4400066938 on OpenAlexaff
Ben Walters, Hamid Rahimian Kalatehbali, Zhengyu Cai, Roman Genov, Amirali Amirsoleimani, Jason K. Eshraghian, Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuromorphic Computing and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMNIST databaseSpiking neural networkNeuromorphic engineeringComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEncoderPattern recognition (psychology)InferenceNoise reductionEncoding (memory)Spike (software development)Noise (video)Machine learningDeep learningArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Auto-encoders are capable of performing input reconstruction, denoising, and classification through an encoder-decoder structure. Spiking Auto-Encoders (SAEs) can utilize asynchronous sparse spikes to improve power efficiency and processing latency on neuromorphic hardware. In our work, we propose an efficient SAE trained using only Spike-Timing-Dependant Plasticity (STDP) learning. Our auto-encoder uses the Time-To-First-Spike (TTFS) encoding scheme and needs to update all synaptic weights only once per input, promoting both training and inference efficiency due to the extreme sparsity. We showcase robust reconstruction performance on the Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) and Fashion-MNIST datasets with significantly fewer spikes compared to state-of-the-art SAEs by 1–3 orders of magnitude. Moreover, we achieve robust noise reduction results on the MNIST dataset. When the same noisy inputs are used for classification, accuracy degradation is reduced by 30%–80% compared to prior works. It also exhibits classification accuracies comparable to previous STDP-based classifiers, while remaining competitive with other backpropagation-based spiking classifiers that require global learning through gradients and significantly more spikes for encoding and classification of MNIST/Fashion-MNIST inputs. The presented results demonstrate a promising pathway towards building efficient sparse spiking auto-encoders with local learning, making them highly suited for hardware integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuromorphic Computing and EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207