MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400067559 · doi:10.26443/crae.v50i1.1126

Perceptions de la Culture des Jeunes chez des Enseignant.e.s Spécialistes en Arts au Secondaire et Stratégies pour L’intégrer à L’Enseignement

2024· article· fr· W4400067559 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Christine Faucher, Samuelle Rousseau Lamontagne

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d’éducation artistique · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalFonds de recherche du QuébecUniversité LavalFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyArtHumanitiesPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les résultats d’analyse d’entretiens menés avec des enseignant.e.s en arts visuels, en danse, en musique et en art dramatique ont permis de mieux comprendre leurs perceptions concernant la culture des jeunes et les stratégies pour l’intégrer à leur enseignement. Parmi ces stratégies figurent la pédagogie négociée, le recours à des repères culturels ancrés dans la culture non formelle des élèves et l’aménagement d’espaces de rencontre entre cette culture et la culture transmise à l’école. Cette recherche permet d’enrichir la pratique enseignante de spécialistes en arts du secondaire souhaitant s’actualiser et rejoindre leurs élèves dans la complexité de leurs univers culturels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d’éducation artistiqueSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207