Stereoelectroencephalography of the Deep Brain: Basal Ganglia and Thalami
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has emerged as a transformative tool in epilepsy surgery, shedding light on the complex network dynamics involved in focal epilepsy. This review explores the role of SEEG in elucidating the role of deep brain structures, namely the basal ganglia and thalamus, in epilepsy. SEEG advances understanding of their contribution to seizure generation, propagation, and control by permitting precise and minimally invasive sampling of these brain regions. The basal ganglia, comprising the subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus, substantia nigra, and striatum, have gained recognition for their involvement in both focal and generalized epilepsy. Electrophysiological recordings reveal hyperexcitability and increased synchrony within these structures, reinforcing their role as critical nodes within the epileptic network. Furthermore, low-frequency and high-frequency stimulation of the basal ganglia have demonstrated potential in modulating epileptogenic networks. Concurrently, the thalamus, a key relay center, has garnered prominence in epilepsy research. Disrupted thalamocortical connectivity in focal epilepsy underscores its significance in seizure maintenance. The thalamic subnuclei, including the anterior nucleus, centromedian, and medial pulvinar, present promising neuromodulatory targets, suggesting pathways for personalized epilepsy therapies. The prospect of multithalamic SEEG and thalamic SEEG stimulation trials has the potential to revolutionize epilepsy management, offering tailored solutions for challenging cases. SEEG's ability to unveil the dynamics of deep brain structures in epilepsy promises enhanced and personalized epilepsy care in our new era of precision medicine. Until deep brain SEEG is accepted as a standard of care, a rigorous informed consent process remains paramount for patients for whom such an exploration is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".