MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nonoperative Treatment versus Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

2024· book-chapter· en· W4400075771 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Davies, Peter Reilly

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder and Clavicle Injuries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClavicleMedicineFixation (population genetics)Surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Canadian Clavicle Trial compared nonoperative management to plate fixation in randomized patients with completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. The study included 132 adult patients with acute closed fractures. Follow-up was extended to twelve months. Shoulder function scores were superior in the operative group at all time points, and there was no difference in range of motion. The nonunion risk was greater following nonoperative management (14%) compared to fixation (3%). Metalwork irritation and prominence occurred in 18%, and 5% of patients underwent reoperation for infection. Patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures should be carefully counseled regarding each management option.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicShoulder and Clavicle InjuriesFrench-language works237,207