MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400076066 · doi:10.1130/g52202.1

The role of Fe(II)-silicate gel in the generation of Archean and Paleoproterozoic chert

2024· article· en· W4400076066 on OpenAlexaff
Rosalie Tostevin, Serhat Sevgen

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcheanGeologyGeochemistrySilicatePetrologyChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chert is abundant in Archean and Paleoproterozoic rocks and is commonly densely packed with authigenic Fe(II)-silicate nanoparticles such as greenalite, indicating a close relationship between iron and silica deposition. We investigate the relationship between Fe(II)-silicate minerals and dissolved silica during precipitation, settling, and diagenesis using anoxic synthesis, sorption, and heating experiments. Excess silica is associated with the solid during precipitation, resulting in high molar Si/Fe ratios (<1.52) that exceed that of stoichiometric greenalite (0.67). At pH 8–8.5, silica sorbs to the surface, reaching sorption densities of 0.68 mmol Si per mmol Fe(II)-silicate. Furthermore, excess Si is released upon heating as the Fe(II)-silicate gel crystallizes. We suggest that Fe(II)-silicate minerals acted as an effective Si shuttle between the water column and the sediments in Archean and Paleoproterozoic marine environments, providing sites for the growth of early diagenetic chert, consistent with observations from the sedimentary record. Our results explain the exceptional preservation of greenalite in early chert and indicate that these minerals could provide a robust archive of marine geochemical data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207