MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400076066 · doi:10.1130/g52202.1

The role of Fe(II)-silicate gel in the generation of Archean and Paleoproterozoic chert

2024· article· en· W4400076066 on OpenAlexaff
Rosalie Tostevin, Serhat Sevgen

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcheanGeologyGeochemistrySilicatePetrologyChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chert is abundant in Archean and Paleoproterozoic rocks and is commonly densely packed with authigenic Fe(II)-silicate nanoparticles such as greenalite, indicating a close relationship between iron and silica deposition. We investigate the relationship between Fe(II)-silicate minerals and dissolved silica during precipitation, settling, and diagenesis using anoxic synthesis, sorption, and heating experiments. Excess silica is associated with the solid during precipitation, resulting in high molar Si/Fe ratios (<1.52) that exceed that of stoichiometric greenalite (0.67). At pH 8–8.5, silica sorbs to the surface, reaching sorption densities of 0.68 mmol Si per mmol Fe(II)-silicate. Furthermore, excess Si is released upon heating as the Fe(II)-silicate gel crystallizes. We suggest that Fe(II)-silicate minerals acted as an effective Si shuttle between the water column and the sediments in Archean and Paleoproterozoic marine environments, providing sites for the growth of early diagenetic chert, consistent with observations from the sedimentary record. Our results explain the exceptional preservation of greenalite in early chert and indicate that these minerals could provide a robust archive of marine geochemical data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207