MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400076431 · doi:10.61838/kman.irphe.30.2.7

Reflection on the Individual Capabilities of Teacher Educators based on the Perspectives of Teacher Educators in Iran and Canada

2024· article· en· W4400076431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
zohre ababaf

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Professional Development and Motivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReflection (computer programming)Mathematics educationPsychologyTeacher educationPedagogyMedical educationSociologyMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study and reflection on the individual capabilities of teacher educators are of special importance due to the role that educators play in education of the students, producing knowledge, and contributing to social development and transformation. This subject was explored from the perspective of experienced teacher educators in the field of teacher training, based on a qualitative research design with a phenomenological approach. Participants in this research were purposefully selected based on three criteria: teaching experience in teacher education, professorial rank for Canadian educators, and two decades of teaching experience for educators at Farhangian University, considering the diversity of groups. A total of 18 educators from Iran and Canada were selected. Data collection was based on individual and semi-structured interviews using open-ended questions. The data obtained from the interviews were analyzed based on analytical induction. Seven areas of individual capability were inferred from the data analysis. The areas of motivation and professional commitment, strategic nature, and personal characteristics were emphasized more than other capabilities by both groups of participants, covering a wide range of individual capabilities. Strategic action, motivated by professional commitment and relying on personal capacities in interaction with cognitive abilities, introspection, communication, collectivism, and reflective action operates. Comparing the findings of the two groups of educators showed that despite geographical and cultural differences, there are common professional concerns in the field of individual capabilities of teacher educators, but their manifestation is influenced by the cultural context of the work environment. Farhangian University educators focus on professional roles with a duty-oriented approach, while Canadian teacher educators focus on professional identity with a problem-finding and independent approach. The findings of this research can be considered in designing curriculum of educator education and in developing indicators for promoting educators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeacher Professional Development and MotivationFrench-language works237,207