An Intelligent Power Transformers Diagnostic System Based on Hierarchical Radial Basis Functions Improved by Linde Buzo Gray and Single-Layer Perceptron Algorithms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transformers are fundamental and among the most expensive electrical devices in any power transmission and distribution system. Therefore, it is essential to implement powerful maintenance methods to monitor and predict their condition. Due to its many advantages—such as early detection, accurate diagnosis, cost reduction, and rapid response time—dissolved gas analysis (DGA) is regarded as one of the most effective ways to assess a transformer’s condition. In this contribution, we propose a new probabilistic hierarchical intelligent system consisting of five subnetworks of the radial basis functions (RBF) type. Indeed, hierarchical classification minimizes the complexity of the discrimination task by employing a divide-and-conquer strategy, effectively addressing the issue of unbalanced data (a significant disparity between the categories to be predicted). This approach contributes to a more precise and sophisticated diagnosis of transformers. The first subnetwork detects the presence or absence of defects, separating defective samples from healthy ones. The second subnetwork further classifies the defective samples into three categories: electrical, thermal, and cellulosic decomposition. The samples in these categories are then precisely assigned to their respective subcategories by the third, fourth, and fifth subnetworks. To optimize the hyperparameters of the five models, the Linde–Buzo–Gray algorithm is implemented to reduce the number of centers (radial functions) in each subnetwork. Subsequently, a single-layer perceptron is trained to determine the optimal synaptic weights, which connect the intermediate layer to the output layer. The results obtained with our proposed system surpass those achieved with another implemented alternative (a single RBF), with an average sensitivity percentage as high as 96.85%. This superiority is validated by a Student’s t-test, showing a significant difference greater than 5% (p-value < 0.001). These findings demonstrate and highlight the relevance of the proposed hierarchical configuration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".