MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400085592 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.00380

Optimal Dynamic Clearing for Interbank Payments

2024· article· en· W4400085592 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shuzhen Chen, Opher Baron, Ningyuan Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSimulent (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClearingInterbank lending marketPaymentEconomicsActuarial scienceMonetary economicsEconometricsFinanceMonetary policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the optimal clearing policy for a financial payment system composed of a number of member banks and a central bank in a dynamic setting, when new payment obligations or debts between member banks are generated over time. The central bank clears the debts among members in the system in order to minimize the costs, including the setup cost of each clearing, the variable cost of clearing the net debts, and the liquidity cost of uncleared debts. We formulate the problem using dynamic programming via state space reduction that provides a tractable framework to analyze and compute the optimal policy. We characterize the structure of the optimal policy and show that it is optimal for the central bank either to clear all the debts in the system or not to clear at all in each period under mild conditions. This structure leads to efficient computation of the optimal clearing policy. We further characterize the optimal clearing frequency based upon the deterministic approximation for the debt process. We conduct a comprehensive case study based on the data acquired from our industry partner, Payments Canada, to demonstrate the performance of the policy and its feasibility in industrial-size problems. This paper was accepted by Chung Piaw Teo, optimization. Funding: S. Chen’s research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72101273, 72188101, 72101258, and 71991463], the Humanities and Social Science General Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [Grant 21YJC630008], and the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 2022JJ40643]. Support for O. Baron’s research on this paper was provided by a grant from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). N. Chen’s research was supported by the NSERC [Discovery Grant RGPIN-2020-04038]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00380 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement ScienceSame topicBanking stability, regulation, efficiencyFrench-language works237,207