Reconstructing Snow-Free Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery: A Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sentinel-2 satellites are one of the major instruments in remote sensing (RS) technology that has revolutionized Earth observation research, as its main goal is to offer high-resolution satellite data for dynamic monitoring of Earth’s surface and climate change detection amongst others. However, visual observation of Sentinel-2 satellite data has revealed that most images obtained during the winter season contain snow noise, posing a major challenge and impediment to satellite RS analysis of land surface. This singular effect hampers satellite signals from capturing important surface features within the geographical area of interest. Consequently, it leads to information loss, image processing problems due to contamination, and masking effects, all of which can reduce the accuracy of image analysis. In this study, we developed a snow-cover removal (SCR) model based on the Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks (CycleGANs) architecture. Data augmentation procedures were carried out to salvage the effect of the limited availability of Sentinel-2 image data. Sentinel-2 satellite images were used for model training and the development of a novel SCR model. The SCR model captures snow and other prominent features in the Sentinel-2 satellite image and then generates a new snow-free synthetic optical image that shares the same characteristics as the source satellite image. The snow-free synthetic images generated are evaluated to quantify their visual and semantic similarity with original snow-free Sentinel-2 satellite images by using different image qualitative metrics (IQMs) such as Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM), Universal image quality index (Q), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). The estimated metric data shows that Q delivers more metric values, nearly 95%, than SSIM and PRSN. The methodology presented in this study could be beneficial for RS research in DL model development for environmental mapping and time series modeling. The results also confirm the DL technique’s applicability in RS studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".