MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400090428 · doi:10.1002/anie.202409988

Phosphetene‐Based Polyaromatics: Structure‐Property Relationships and Chiroptical Tuning

2024· article· en· W4400090428 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hortense Lauwick, Erik Kertész, Kristóf Noel Garami, Wimonsiri Huadsai, Matthew P. Duffy, Roukayaati Foundi, Alexandre Chemin, Thierry Roisnel, Nicolas Vanthuyne, Zoltán Benkő, Pierre‐Antoine Bouit, Muriel Hissler

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Circulatory and Respiratory HealthRégion BretagneNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalUniversité de Rennes 1Campus FranceCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMinistère de l'Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation
KeywordsProperty (philosophy)Materials sciencePure mathematicsMathematicsPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe the synthesis of π-extended phosphetene rings (4-member P-rings) flanked with PAH systems of various topologies. These compounds are fully characterized including X-ray diffraction. The impact of both the polyaromatic platform and the P-ring on the structure, and the optical and redox properties are investigated both experimentally and theoretically. Although neither the P centre nor the 4-membered ring significantly takes part in the HOMO or LUMO orbitals, both structural features have an important modulating role in distorting the symmetry of the orbitals, leading to chiroptical properties. The stereogenic P-atom is used as a remote chiral perturbator to induce circularly polarized luminescence of the polyaromatic system. The dissymmetry factor is highly dependent on the polyaromatic topology, as supported by theoretical calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsFrench-language works237,207