MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400091244 · doi:10.1007/s12197-024-09676-9

On the linkage of momentum and reversal – evidence from the G7 stock markets

2024· article· en· W4400091244 on OpenAlex
Daniel Hofmann, Karl Ludwig Keiber, Adalbert Luczak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Economics and Finance · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStock (firearms)EconomicsFinancial economicsStock marketMomentum (technical analysis)Decoupling (probability)Monetary economicsEconometricsGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper studies the linkage of momentum and reversal in the G7 stock markets. We confirm Conrad and Yavuz’s (Rev Financ 21(2):555–581, 2017) finding that momentum is not linked to subsequent return reversal in the US stock market. In the stock markets of the remaining G7 countries, our results object the decoupling of momentum and return reversal. In these stock markets, the two return anomalies are linked to each other. In particular, momentum is followed by return reversal in the stock markets of Germany, the UK, Japan, Canada, France, and Italy. These observations obtain for momentum portfolios which are made up of different risk profiles with respect to size and book-to-market ratio. Our results hold true both in raw returns and in risk-adjusted returns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it